Sunday, December 12, 2010

Um...I sort of went off on my Art History forum.

Yeah, I think my creepy over-analytical had a little too much fun today during my Art History Online class. The following is the transcript from that discussion...well, not the whole thing, but I assure you, I'm not taking anything out of context.

This was out assignment:
"How does Raphael’s the School of Athens exemplify the High Renaissance? Using the images from the text, what work/s do you think best represent/exemplify the High Renaissance and why?

If you were to create a Modern Day School of Athens from leaders in your fields of study whom would you include and why?
Film students may wish to include directors and actors, Marketing and Entertainment Business students can look to the most successful commercials, brands, and ad and campaigns, and Music students may wish to consider musicians, singers and producers."

Just as a note, we're also supposed to respond to another student.

My answer:
"The School of Athens clearly has a bit of a love affair with Western Philosophy, and this of course, is his love letter to it. The compositions intrigues me, since he has the groups clearly separated, and there is no actual person in the center. Yes, I know Plato is right there, but he is not on the steps, in fact there's no one else below him directly. He is further in the background compared to the people on the steps. It almost makes him unattainable in a way. This school of people look unattainable and gives them an attitude, as if they have a smarter than thou vibe about them. However, can you blame them? Without people Plato, where would we be as a people. We wouldn't have Aristotle, and we wouldn't have Raphael. Heck, we might not even have Einstein without the advances this "school" made. Even if they're wisdom seems dated now, it moved us forward.

A modern version of this in the film world (which would probably be somewhat insulting to Raphael, as he held these people in the highest esteem and film as a whole probably doesn't have the same respectability as the history behind painting, but what the hey, let's do it) would definitely have Orson Welles in the center. Citizen Kane (love it or hate it) is probably the most important movie of all time. Included in the picture would be Charlie Chaplin, Jean Luc-Goddard, Akira Kurosawa, Walt Disney, Stanley Kubrick, and Fritz Lang. And now the fun part, my personal favorites, that probably don't belong, but I would want them in there anyways. This would include, Kevin Smith, Bryan Singer, Katshurio Otomo, The Wachowski and Coen Bros, Mamoru Oshii, Christopher Nolan, Darren Aronofsky, Steven Spielberg, Francis Ford Coppola, Satoshi Kon, Quentin Tarantino, Edgar Wright, John Lasseter, Shinichiro Watanabe, and myself in the background somewhere, because why wouldn't I want to hang out with people I admire in a school."

Lord C's Answer (had nothing to do with mine...yet):
"I was truly blown away upon learning about the School of Athens. This is my first time partaking in the beauty and intellectual majesty of it. At first glance, to me it was nothing more than a very detailed and maybe the most eye-catching piece of the High Renaissance. But after realizing what the piece represented and the message that the artist (Raphael) was conveying, I then began to build a greater understanding from the knowledge and wisdom before me. I must say to me the Mona Lisa by De Vinci would be the best representation of the High Renaissance. Simply because of its popularity and how one automatically thinks Renaissance era when you see it.

In my School of Athens Michael Jackson and Jay-z would play the rolls of Plato and Aristotle. Michael would be in the roll of Plato representing the epitome of a musical artist. Michael with his arm raised to the sky, the gesture meaning through the power of music you can become more than man, much like Paul McCartney’s statement “The Beatles are bigger than Jesus”. A student of Michael’s work Jay-z is learning to become more than just an artist in a different way. With today’s mergence of business and art Jay-z is becoming less than a businessman and more of a man that is a business."

Lord C's response to my post:
"Jose,

I love how you pointed to the love affair going on here because it is that intense. Your views on the people on the stairs were very unique and your post overall is highly observent and how you say "there is no actual person in the center." proves it. along with the list of legends you put together in your recast leaves me speechless. Great post."

My response to him (oh boy...here we go.):
"In response to Lord Christopher (which, if that's your real name, it's the second coolest name ever, after Disco San Andreas) I thank you for you kind words, but sadly, I have a bone to pick with you about something you said.
I must say to me the Mona Lisa by De Vinci would be the best representation of the High Renaissance. Simply because of its popularity and how one automatically thinks Renaissance era when you see it.

While the Mona Lisa is a popular painting (with good reason) that is a beautiful work of art, to call it the best representation of the Renaissance era is incredibly subjective, which to your credit, you did say "to me". Obviously, I can disagree with an opinion but can't really do anything to change it. After all, it isn't really wrong or right, it's just yours and yours alone. However, you called it the "best representation". How can one painting be the best representation of a whole era?
To relate this to an industry, I don't study, but follow closely anyways, let's try the same thing for videogames. Many of you (not me) would probably say that your favorite game of all time is probably Modern Warfare 2. A great game by it's own right, but does it really represent videogames as a whole, ignoring the whole "best" part at the moment. Well, no. I mean, there are plenty of games, great games that are nothing like Modern Warfare 2, such as Super Mario Galaxy, Fragile Dreams, Persona 4, Final Fantasy 7, Scribblenauts, Mass Effect and Metal Gear Solid. However, none of the games I mentioned just now are even in the same genre of videogames as Modern Warfare 2 (FPS or First Person Shooter, for those who are unfamiliar). Is it the best representation of it's own genre. No, there are plenty of games even in it's own genre that are nothing like it, such as, Halo, Bioshock, Fallout 3, Metroid Prime, Half-Life, and Red Steel 2 (Not Red Steel 1, that game needs to be forgotten) and they still stand on their own as great games.

Bringing this back to Renaissance art, how can the Mona Lisa be the best representation of the whole era when the painting we're discussing has pretty much nothing in common with it, not even aesthetically. The Mona Lisa is an incredibly close and dark painting compared to The School of Athens, which uses bright colors and wide spaces. There are many other works that share little in common with the Mona Lisa from the same era.

'The influence of this painting cannot be overstated. Leonardo da Vinci’s use of sfumato and his understanding of the enigmatic expression of Lisa Gioconda, wife of Francesco del Gioconda has made this painting one of, if not, the most famous portrait in the world. For those who may not be aware, this oil on wood from 1503-06, resides in the Louvre in Paris. Great choice! Interesting inclusion of Michael J. in your modern School of Athens. I ‘d have to agree about his contributions!'

Now, I also agree with this statement by our teacher, which may seem odd because she totally agrees with you while I don't. I believe that while influence can shape artists minds to take what came before them, the whole point of evolving is to use what works and what doesn't. Having an influence is not the same thing as being the best representation of an entire era of art, or that whole genre of art. It's easy to leave a stamp or marking on an art, but essentially with such of variety of ideas and arts out there, there will never be true representation of art by simply one piece. Really, the best representation of art is all of it, the good and bad (because without the bad, how would we appreciate the good?).

Well, I've rambled on, (and feel like I haven't said enough) and perhaps I'll return to this subject later. For now, I'll just leave with this. I didn't mean to destroy something subjective. If that's your viewpoint, no matter how many long winded internet posts I write, I will never change that, but hopefully I've somewhat presented some new ideas for you to take into consideration.

Plus, I really think I wanted to work in videogames into my post somehow and still have it be relevant."

I'm waiting for someone to rebuttal my statement that "Citizen Kane (love it or hate it) is probably the most important movie of all time."

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Couldn't sleep so I decided to do this...

10:46 PM

At least it was 10:46 when I typed that. Google decided to save it at 10:47PM, using their autosave feature. How nice of them. I'm currently using the Wi-Fi at Full Sail building 3B, typing away because I couldn't sleep at home. Hell, I really can't sleep here either. But it's comfortable, and gives me something to do while I wait for my 12 hour shoot to begin at 1:00 AM.

I've got to be honest, I'm probably just typing this out because I remembered that it still existed and I thought I should update it. But while I'm here and I've got your attention, I'll try not to waste your time. Today was my last day on my podcast, Undefined Gamer. I said farewell to the podcast on it's 30th episode and I built that show up to where it is today, with Michael being a huge part of it by my side. He was more crazy about the show than I was, and he put probably more effort into it, which is probably why I knew I was going to leave it behind.

I feel like I've truly left a lot of things behind, like I'm finally growing up. Sure, I'm still immature, crass, and sarcastic, but even my humor doesn't feel the same. I know that sounds deep, or that I may want it to sound deep, but don't look to much into it. It's just something I've noticed a bit.

10:55 PM is when Google autosaved this entry, yet I typed this part at 10:57 PM.

You know, this is the first time I've actually written something in a while. I have a lot of ideas that I usually get on paper right away, but lately I haven't been doing that. This school's probably wearing me out. I should start drinking coffee.

Note: If I ever start drinking coffee, I want you to punch me in the gut every time you see me.

Second note: Make sure it's coffee. I get hot chocolate from Starbucks a lot.

Third note: Tricking me into drinking coffee, doesn't count.

I feel like posting this up already but I still haven't said anything. So, I'm going to keep going until I say something relevant because I promised that I wouldn't waste your time. Although, to be fair, how important is your time if you're reading this? Not to sound rude or unappreciative but I don't consider myself a great writer, and neither should you.

On second thought, that does make me sound rude, and pretty much turns you away. What I meant to say was, I'm a great writer, and you should keep reading because I am great, and I appreciate it.

Wow, that makes me sound pretentious and pompous, doesn't it? Ok, how about this? I'm a decent writer and you're a decent reader. Happy?

Just came to realization that I actually do have the same dry humor intact that I said I didn't before. So much for that.

Have you ever wanted to tell people stuff that's going on in your life, but you don't want to sound like a gossipy bitch about it? Lately, I can't seem to shut up about it. I must annoy the hell out of my friends. This actually has nothing to do with anything but it might explain my erratic blog entry. I think I want to tell people, and I think I want people to care, but I think I'll just keep it inside. For now, at least. I'm not exactly the Twitter type to always tell people what's going on, and then be shocked when someone finds out something they weren't supposed to know all because I posted it onto my wall on Facebook. Dumbasses.

My internet just crashed. Luckily I had saved everything beforehand so nothing got lost. Hurray!

Anyways, I guess I really don't have a point. I just want everyone who reads to know I haven't forgotten about this, and I will try harder to get new and cool stuff up. Hell, some of it might actually be meaningful.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Just in case you haven't seen it.

Hey, this was my first time working with Final Cut Pro, and I hope you all enjoy it. Feel free to check out the rest of my videos too.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

I'd just like to point out I haven't forgotten about this.

Sorry, for the 3 people that read this and hasn't seen any new updates. I promise I'll be updating more. It's just been busy. I've got a lot of new topics and ideas that I'm fleshing out so please bear with me.

Saturday, August 7, 2010

Should I pimp my shit? Why not?

Hey everyone, I just thought I'd take the time out to start promoting some stuff. First and foremost, my youtube page!

youtube.com/foxamigo
I promise, more stuff is coming down the pipeline for that soon.

My podcast!
http://undefinedgamer.podomatic.com/
Not updated as frequently as I would like, but we're working on it.

My newest addition to shit I probably won't update as often as I'd like! AKA my photography hobby.
http://jeargumedo.deviantart.com/

My Facebook! Which I will not add you if I do not know you, but feel free to try. There's a good chance I'll ignore you.
facebook.com/joseargumedo

My Twitter!
Psych! Don't have one!

Monday, August 2, 2010

How to post a sad entry without sounding emo or why are you all e-mailing me?

No one likes emo kids. Be honest, they suck, and before you defend it, they also think they suck, because if they didn't then why would they be emo. I'm all for expressing one's self but usually, when you express yourself it adds something to society. Even appearing emo guarantee's people judging you right away as a pussy. Wearing black does not make someone emo, by the way. Black is a cool color and they seem to have reclaimed it from us.

Hell, while goth people aren't exactly my favorite people to be around at least they aren't pussies. The sad part is, I think the emo style is actually quite cool looking (well...some, not all), if only it wasn't for their personalities. Any guy who wears skinny jeans, you might as well castrate yourself. Any girl who wears skinny jeans...ok you got me there, but my point still stands that emo people are annoying.

Unfortunately emo kids have totally ruined actual emotion so much that when you actually reach sadness, people tell you to stop being emo. It's almost impossible to be sad now, thanks to this subculture. They also all think they same thing about everything, it has such a clique mentality behind it. As soon as band gets somewhat popular, oh shit, they sold out. It's like as soon as the 100th person discovers them, their old news now. This is not proper underground appreciation. Just because something goes mainstream or becomes popular doesn't destroy art as we know it. The thing that made us fall in love with it in the first place is still there, we just don't like the fact that the art wanted to seen or heard by more people than just us. After all, it's not like a monogamous relationship between two people. However, I still understand how it feels sometimes when something gets popular and all of the sudden I'm less attached to it, so that even sounds hypocritical on my part, but I acknowledge it and don't quite understand why I feel this way sometimes. But I digress, my point is that as soon as you post a sad or seemingly sad entry, you've been regarded as emo...and I truly hate that word.

A couple of weeks ago, I posted about romance, and despite my explanations, it seems like people ignored that happy ending I put and seem to think that I am totally alone...at least those of you who sent me Facebook messages because you wouldn't post in the comments.

Ok, I'm about to go on a tangent again about something completely unrelated so bare with me here. Please, post comments on the blog when you want to talk to me about a blog post. It keeps me sane. Don't send me Facebook messages, or fill the e-mail inbox of my podcast with those kinds of questions. Now, back to our main story.

Yes, I am single, and have been for a long time now, but it honestly doesn't bother me as it did a few months back. I'm in school, incredibly busy with the blog...sort of...and the podcast...again, sort of...but it's mostly school that's keeping me busy. While I would still like to have a relationship...like say, now...I'm not exactly as desperate as some people like to think I am. Yes, I do obsess and complain in real life about that stuff with my friends, but it's usually in a joking manner, with a huge smile on my face. Let's face facts, as much as I pretend to be older, and even more mature and sophisticated sometimes, I'm only 21. I've got a long road of mistakes ahead of me, and I'm in no hurry to make them.

That blog post came out just simple boredom and need for an entry. I thought it was cool, and something to diversify the blog a bit, after all, this isn't a tech blog, it's just a writing blog. A place to store my thoughts in general, and not really detailed status of my well-being or emotion. You probably won't find that on the internet, you'll get that from actually talking to me.

I'm glad that I did get a somewhat large response from that, even if there are no comments...and I know all of you...but I'm glad some of you decided to share your thoughts, and even check to see if I was cutting myself (I wasn't, but thanks...I guess).

Ok...sorry, I'm about to go a random thought again. I've just noticed that used the ellipsis...about 14...15 times in this post, and they're probably...going to...become...more...frequent. In all seriousness, ADD had taken hold and I needed to type that.

My point in that post was to really point out how stupid love is...and how many stupid things we'll do to achieve it. Yet, in the end, it's worth it. I mean, seriously, do I have to be funny or playful at all times with my writing before I type something serious into the computer?

Something I think I was also trying to get out, but I personally think I failed at conveying, was a rant towards myself. Too many times I have looked at a woman and fallen miserably in love. No, I don't just lust after a woman, I find that to be barbaric and somewhat below me to solely want a woman for her body (However, that doesn't hurt her chances of me...probably never talking to her because of that) but I truly do like someone with a good head on their shoulders. Willing to explore the things I like for the first time and keeping an open mind about it, while I try my best to do the same (sadly, I'm pretty closed minded but I honestly try) and simply being able to hold a conversation on one subject for a lengthy period of time.

I can think of 3 people in my audience who reads these, have actually met the "requirements" (and I use the term loosely...also because I can't think of another term) in the last two sentences of the above paragraph and I can guarantee that I have either had a crush on them or asked them out (to save them the embarrassment, I won't say who they are) and yet now I moved on and just see them as friends. How does that happen? I mean really think about that. Essentially, the person hasn't changed but I have because of something I did of my own accord. How can I fall out of love so easily? Am I alone here? I'm starting to think that I'm the only guy who gives this any thought...and also, I'm starting to think my brains are way bigger than my balls (I went a really long time writing this blog without a dick joke, spare me.).

Ok, so what the fuck am I getting at? Well, first, thanks for not clicking away during all this nonsense, because I actually do have a point. My point is, make sure you understand someone's message before you confront or try to comfort the person, because then you just start making an ass out of yourself...and you probably make the person who sent the message look bad too.

I'll end this on a happy note, instead of a scolding. There is someone out there that I'm looking at, and unlike...well...I don't want to give too much away. I know she isn't reading this, and I'm also afraid of the people who know who I'm talking about posting something in the comments about it. So I'll be brief. I truly like this person and it seems odd how we met, and odd how our potential friendship/(hopefully)relationship is going to develop. Yet, I'm still optimistic about it, despite of all the potential things in my life that could get in the way. No matter what happens, I'll be hanging in there...and typing up stupid blog entries for your entertainment.

(Also, count how many times I used parenthesis in this post. I'm telling you, counting is fun!)

Sunday, July 18, 2010

Piracy, and what should be done about it?

Piracy is a tough subject to talk about with people because nobody truly cares because nobody really sees the damage being done, or they actually think they're doing the right thing. When studios or whoever, go about putting grandma's and little girls on trial over the download of the latest Britney Spears song, it doesn't put them in them best light either.

The entertainment industry as a whole is going through changes. Whether it be videogames, movies, music, anything can now be found on the internet and downloaded illegally, and I totally disapprove. People work hard on their craft, and while piracy has been cited as one of the ways to put work out there (which even helped famous bands like Metallica become popular in the early days through copied tapes) there has to be a better way of discovering new media.

Here's the dilemma though. If you want the best quality, you usually have to go with the most expensive option. For movies, that's Blu-ray. For music, that's CD's (or vinyl, DVD audio or Super Audio CD for the audiophile among us). For videogames, well, it really depends, but you get what I mean. If you want the best quality, it usually comes from a physical piece of media mastered by the studio and if you want it cheap and fast, you usually to download it off iTunes or Amazon, maybe it stream it from Netflix, or worse, download a shaky-cam version of your favorite movie.

Lossless codecs are starting to become more and more mainstream but iTunes does not provide them for music, and HD codecs such as VC-1 are incredibly effective at keeping detail intact on Blu-rays but once again, Netflix streams everything in lesser quality, even when it's in HD. I get why they do this, after all, bandwidth is still restricted and limited, despite how far we've come. Besides quality, the lack of portability or allowing people to borrow media. For example, buy a Blu-ray and lend it to a friend and it'll play in his Blu-ray player. Try and give him a legally downloaded iTunes file, and good luck trying to watch it.

Apple, in particular, has this idea of a walled-garden. You can have almost anything you want within that garden, but God forbid you try and take it somewhere else, or there's something beyond the wall that you may want.

iTunes is a beautiful program, that syncs media and apps between multiple computers and other Apple branded devices...but what if you want to watch it on your TV? Buy an AppleTV and it'll sync up perfectly...but the AppleTV is a lowly product. I have a 360, a PS3, hell even my Wii can handle media better than the AppleTV, but I can't sync my iTunes library with them. I also have a couple of bits of media on my Xbox through Zune, and even more media on my PS3 that can't sync or cross borders. Every system is locked down, leaving a library of stuff dedicated to each machine. Why can't I have all my media just play on anything I want? Whether it be a computer, a DVD player, or my toaster, let me pick where I want to experience it.

Netflix is really the only place where I can watch media almost anywhere, but again, I'm limited to the material they have making ownership impossible. If more companies were to follow Netflix's example, I think we can curb piracy, and not treat the customer like second rate citizens. Hopefully, we'll have this all sorted out before physical media bites the dust eventually.

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Intellectual romance is an oxymoron...

Here from behind my sight, my thoughts my mind
Show from the light
The time is right
And from the depth within show the balance
Of outer and inner harmony
Mind and heart, soul and spirit undivided
Here's where teh true strength and beauty lies
We'll see this before us with our own eyes
We'll see, with our own eyes... LOVE


-Lyrics from Living in the Shell

Living in the Shell is one of my favorite songs of all time, the stength of Steve Conte's voice pulled back into a rather sweet song about imagination, discovering one's self through dreams and passing thoughts, and being excited and unclear of what this all means (at least, that's my interpretation of the song, feel free to disagree.)

The chorus changes the viewpoint of the singer a couple of times, almost as if he is talking to his past self, and something has caused him to feel called and given him a purpose.

Towards the end of the song, Shanti Synder recites that poem (note, it's not sung, it's spoken, which amplifies it's effect).

The male has been called away from his "shell" to this woman because he has fallen for this woman and is unsure of his feelings towards her.. He is preparing to venture out of his "shell" to find out.

FULL DISCLOSURE: Living in the Shell is off the Ghost in the Shell soundtrack, hence the "shell" so the song also probably deals with cybernetics, but I don't believe this is a major point in the song, but again this is just my personal interpretation of the song, feel free to disagree.

Ok, so what does this have to do with the title of this post? Some of you might think:

"Didn't you just totally disprove that romance can't be viewed from an intellectual stand-point? You just did it with a song off an anime soundtrak that may or may-have nothing to do with romance."

Think again, and watch as I destory everything I just said from an overanalytical stand point!

The man in this song apparently has never talked back to this calling, he doesn't know who this is. You remember when you were young, and someone you didn't know called for you? Did you ever go to that person?

No, because as a child you shouldn't approach strangers. Let's strip the spirituality out of the song for a minute. In fact, let's put these two characters in the song in an environment that might make sense.

You're a guy, with an appreciation for the arts (rare thing, I know) and instead of going out with the guys to drink beers, butt heads over simple opinions, stating their opinions as fact, and of course, measuring things. You know, stereotypical guy things. Our male character in our little scenario is similar to his friends but just didn't feel like doing that, and went to a poetry night for some out of character reason.

Upon the stage he is continually unimpressed by the so-called nonsensical words that pass for poetry nowadays.

Suddenly, a beautiful woman, steps into the spotlight. She pulls out the paper with her delicate hands, slightly trembling at all the people watching her every move, her stance on stage is not as confident as the other so-called poets, but her small voice, carrying the most magnificent words with meaning behind them, and it seems like as she goes on, her confidence improves because it seems that she has been talking to him the whole time, and he's seemingly made eye contact with her. His heart is outracing the fastest drag car in the world, and all he can for her is stare.

Pray tell, what did he fall in love with? Her beauty? Her shyness at the beginning? Her confidence at the end? The eye contact that was possibly was made? The words she spoke? The whole package?

I know most of you are saying the whole thing, but I'll kill that one right now, while destroying the rest of those details.

What just happened was a moment in time, not a bad moment, mind you, but a moment never to be repeated again. Nothing in life is ever exactly the same. Hell, that goes for everything, you can watch a movie twice and have a completely different experience and opinion of it each time (I'm looking at you Stanley Kubrick), your daily routine is always slightly different, even if it feels like the same mundane thing, and even if you recorded that moment on camera and showed it to our male character, even his experience would be different. Moments are lost like tears in rain to paraphrase a quote from Blade Runner. The trick is to continue feeling the way you did during that moment. So what if he actually just fell in love with that moment but can never recall those feelings ever again?

So maybe he fell in love with her beauty, but now she's out of the stage light and you realize she isn't as beautiful as she was onstage. However, that's shallow of him, so let's go for the shyness. She really never opens up to him now, and is so paralyzed by this trait that conversation is almost impossible, and he's probably going to get nowhere with that, so let's try her confidence that she showed, and let's say the shyness thing was an act. Her confidence has now made him timid and he is afraid of her being overpowering. Ok, so the eye contact! Turns out she was looking above everyone and never down at the audience to keep her concentration intact (as a good performer should do) it just appeared like she looked at him.

Her words! There's truth to her words! Even if she know doesn't him, he was entranced by the words she spoke. Nothing more beautiful and honest in this world than those words to him at this moment, and he wants to dig this person's brain to see if there are more words to match his own and finally see if there's someone on this planet that understands him like he seems to understand her.

Turns out, she didn't even write it.

She was just reading it for her friend who was too shy to come up onstage. Did I just break your heart? He possibly would have been better off never talking to her.

Now what is the point of all this? There are some things that we become attached to and we can even describe why, but I don't believe that love is one of them. The couple that seemed so lovey-dovey with each other but splits up only 5 weeks in to their relationship, while the couple who have pulled knives on each other but has been together for 45 years, and will continue to be that way until death do them part. Neither makes sense to really anyone. I don't even believe the people in those relationships could ever explain it.

There's no logic, no rhyme, no reason, no single iota of thought behind love. It can drive you mad, it can drive other people to kill you, and it can drive your car off a bridge to prove a point. More than war, harmful substances, and just plain old accidents, I believe love will be the end all be all of your life. Women and men are made for each other biologically, but intellectually we're both different, both sides viewing the other as crazy. If your gay, then you have even less of a reason to love, because you aren't made for each other biologically, and even the same sex couples will see things differently over the other. So other than the continued survival of our species (yet, humanity is the only creature capable of self-loathing, think about it for a while) why would we subject ourselves to embarrassment and danger that is love?

Because as much as love can kill us, we'll simply die without it. Something we can't live without as a species, and something that could potentially kill off our species is something that is completely illogical, and throwing the words "intellectual romance" together causes a the rarest of morons to be formed, the one made out of oxygen, the illusive, oxymoron.

Love is a threat, love is a enabler. Won't live very long with it, and won't live at all without it.

And I wouldn't have it any other way.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Why art style matters in video games.

As consoles get more powerful and graphics get closer and closer to photorealism gamers need to remember that better graphics do not make a better game. A shit game that looks amazingly cool, will still play like shit, and while having a nice presentation can definitely help a game, it will never be the end all be all solution. After all, unlike movies, you don't play videogames to marvel at the visuals, you play them to have fun. Having something cool to look at doesn't hurt though.

Photorealism can help a game. I believe the Mass Effect series benefits from this, despite it's sci-fi setting, using it to ground it's cast of characters. Another game, like Zelda uses a variety of art styles between games to keep it fresh and unique within each game.

Art style can make a game way more appealing to people who might have never played that genre of games, but I feel that developers are still playing it too safe. Survival horror for example hasn't strayed far from it's "realistic" roots, and many of the games in the genre just cover the place in darkness. While this is definitely an effective way of getting a mood across but I would love to see a survival horror game, or just a horror game in general that is just covered in bright colors.

I would love to go on and name a bunch of examples, but in truth, I can only trust that developers put enough care into the art style of the game, and not depend on the photorealism or some of the gunmetal grey's and dirty brown colors and experiment with making the game look unique. Red Steel looks like a typical shooter, while Red Steel 2 looks a hell of a lot better with it's new style, and it took the shooter to new heights and highlighted it's new gameplay mechanics. If it just used the same style, I think the game would have honestly failed.

Developers, please experiment, and have fun. After all, if you have fun developing the game, chances are, we'll have fun playing it. Of course, you probably didn't need me to tell you that.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Undefined Gamer will be back next week.

Just so you know, we at Undefined Gamer were on vacation, but we'll be getting back into the swing of things next week. In the meantime, enjoy this small blog entry.

Sunday, July 4, 2010

My "Fragile Dreams: Farewell Ruins Of The Moon" Review

The following is reprinted from my original review from GameFAQs. You may read the original here.


"There's no other experience like this out there, and one that is unlikely to be repeated."

Metal Gear couldn't do it, Final Fantasy couldn't do it, Heavy Rain couldn't do it...

It might seem weird that I mentioned those other games but I'll get to those in a second. Fragile Dreams: Farewell Ruins Of The Moon is a hard game to categorize. It's not survival horror, despite the long time spent among ghosts, monsters and other creatures, as well as haunting locations. It's not a RPG, despite the leveling up involved, and the RPG elements in the game. It's not an action game, the game will often go for a whole half-hour before anything pops out to attack you, and even then it's easy to just avoid combat most of the time. I guess it could be considered an adventure game, as that is what it most closely resembles, but I don't even consider it that either. It really takes elements from a lot of genres to create an experience that is so well-crafted that is really rare in gaming. In an art-form seemingly bursting at the seams with space soldiers, whimsical cartoon characters, overly-complex and convoluted stories designed to insure that they can make sequel after sequel, and the games simply there to relax and party, it is very nice to see a simple story with well-rounded characters kept together for the most part engaging gameplay. Tri-Cresendo took a risk on the Wii and it pays off for the few who will play this game. It really isn't a game for everyone, but it saddens me that this game isn't for everyone, simply because it's different from other games out there. With such simple story, but with so much care put into it this game will be a cult classic for the Wii, and I really hope this game does get more playtime. However, if a sequel never comes out for this game, I would be happy, in fact, ecstatic, because it wraps up nicely and doesn't need to continue, similar to the way I felt about BioShock. I was happy the game did well, but honestly, I felt the game didn't need a sequel. Anyways, I'm rambling a bit, but that's because this game really touched me in a way that no other game could quite get.

Back to the games I mentioned at the top of this review, I mentioned them because many times, you could tell that those games really went out of their way to get an emotional reaction out of you. The one emotion all those games have tried at some point is sadness, and to try and make the player cry. While I did feel emotion during those games, and genuinely thought they were good, they never made me cry, something which is extremely rare for me. I'm not trying to say I'm some macho-guy, but there's only a handful of movies that have ever moved me to tears, and no video game has ever done that...

...until I played Fragile. Fragile Dreams: Farewell Ruins Of The Moon moved me to tears.

Graphics 8.5/10

There is some really strong tech here on display. Now, Wii is not a powerhouse of a console, when it comes to graphics, but this game makes the best of it. The character designs are not really realistic, which help the graphics out. The textures are very sharp in most environments, and the lighting effects are actually some of the best on the console. Characters are detailed and for the most part the game looks beautiful. The ghosts deserve special mention, because not only are they detailed but are actually somewhat translucent giving them this eerie look to them that really adds to the graphics. This game is one of the best looking games on the console, and while it's not perfect, this game shows that with some attention payed to the hardware you can get your game to look great on a non-HD console.

I have to touch base on the lighting again. See, in this game you have a flashlight and wander around in dark environments (mostly). Obviously since one of the central gameplay mechanics revolves around light, they payed close attention to this. The light controls and behaves very realistically in this game. It's one of the best games I've ever seen to make such good use of light, and while it's not the best (Silent Hill: Shattered Memories on the Wii alone, takes that title away, not including anything on the HD consoles) the effort was put forward and it shows.

However, there are still flaws. Occasionally, you'll come across a blurry texture, and some of the finer details don't come out as clearly as some other Wii games. Also, when you're at the hotel (which is the biggest environment in the game) the framerate will slowdown noticeably, and some times when it gets a little too busy, it will slow down. Even with these flaws, the rest of the game is so strong graphically that anything you find to be off is quickly forgotten as you look towards the dawn slowly rising beyond the horizon or walking down a corridor in an abandoned underground mall.

Sound 10/10

If there's something they payed more attention to than the graphics, it's definitely the sound of the game. Easily the strongest quality of the game, it holds it's head up high among games like Resident Evil 4, or anything from Silent Hill. Now, it's actually really hard to compare this game sound-wise to any other game that really does sound well, such as Modern Warfare 2 (which is one of best sounding games out there), because unlike a game like that, this game is really quiet. Hell, I even have reservations about comparing it to Resident Evil 4 or the Silent Hill series because even those games are loud compared to this one. This game uses music very minimally, but when it does, every theme is memorable and enjoyable (which, thank God, I got the soundtrack for this) and it helps the mood. Most of the time all you hear is the lonely footsteps of you walking along these abandoned places where people used to roam. The sound truly makes you feel isolated and alone, and when any enemy comes by, they sound threatening. The enemies don't exactly roar or snare at you, some cry, some laugh, and some really don't make noise at all. It's truly unsettling and will get to you.

Going back to the music, I want to make a special mention about the opening (Hikari) and closing (Tsuki No Nukumori) songs as being two of the most fitting songs for a videogame ever.

Anyways, the game includes a brand new English dub as well as the original Japanese voices. There is a lot of voice acting in this game, with very talented voice actors to give off great performances. To be quite honest, you really should listen to it in Japanese. The English dub isn't bad, and it's actually one of the higher quality dubs out there for a game, but trust me on this one, the Japanese voice actors really give stand-out performances that overshadow the quality English dub by a long shot. I'm just happy that they included the option, and thankfully there are subtitles. Unfortunately, the subtitles are dubtitles (meaning they just took the dub's script and placed them as the subtitles, which is not as accurate as a direct translation) however, the script is extremely faithful and close enough to the original that it really won't bother you. If you know Japanese, you'll notice that there is a more accurate way of translating the dialogue, but if you know Japanese, you'll probably just turn the subtitles off. However, the script has only a couple of extremely minor differences so it won't really make a huge difference and you'll get the story.

Story 9/10

Seto is a 15 year old boy, and seemingly the last human being in the world. After living with an old man for a long time, that old man died leaving Seto completely alone. The old man leaves behind a note telling Seto to go to a red tower to find other survivors. The world is barren and empty, lacking any sort of life. Plant-life has taken over the cement jungles of Tokyo, and memories of people are left behind in artifacts of the world.

In his journey to find other people, he comes across a silver-haired girl. The first sign of life he's seen ever since leaving on this journey has run off. He is on a quest to find her, and hopefully share his thoughts, his feelings, and live out the rest of his days searching for a meaning to all this, with her.

There's more to this game, but the less you know the better. The story is extremely well-crafted and while the pacing of the game is very slow, it matches the tone of the story. Most of the game unfolds in gameplay, and while there are cutscenes, you never feel overwhelmed by them and feel like you add to the story instead of being dragged along by the nose, despite the linear nature of the game.

Gameplay 7/10

Here's where the game has the most flaws. The combat is a bit wonky and a little slow. The game also could have been improved with a lock on system but it actually doesn't make combat all that bad. It's not the best combat system in a game but it never gets so frustrating that you'll stop playing. However, the game does allow you to switch between projectile gameplay and close-quarters combat with some pretty easy finesse. The inventory system is a bit of a mess, but not so unmanageable that a little planning ahead can't solve.

However, this game excels at exploring environments. The flashlight controls feel 1:1 (without Wii MotionPlus) and the shortcuts to menus mapped to the D-Pad are natural. Trust me, it's pretty awesome, and you will wander for hours enjoying every minute of it.

The game will get you to love the little moments through it's gameplay and will truly deliver an experience like no other. However, the flaws are there, but you'll be able to get through the game without too much complaint. I'd be remiss if I didn't mention them though.

Final Thoughts

Fragile is a game like no other. It's like no other game out there in this industry. I've never played anything like it and I don't see anything like it coming out anytime soon. Tri-Crescendo has breathed life into this game world like no other game out there. The story is extremely well captured and it's one that doesn't have the same effect if it were to be adapted into another medium. This game stands high in showing why videogames qualify as an artform.

I love this game, and I really want to overlook the flaws of the game but despite that, there are still flaws that need to be noted. Trust me, this is a game worth playing, and if you let it, you will be sucked into this game like no other. It's a hidden gem on the Wii, hell, it's a hidden gem in gaming, period. I really hope this review gets you to buy this game, or at the very least play it. Take a Saturday night off, stay in, turn off the lights and let this game work it's magic.

8/10
Reviewer's Score: 8/10, Originally Posted: 06/28/10
Game Release: Fragile Dreams: Farewell Ruins of the Moon (US, 03/16/10)

-Author's note, stay tuned to Undefined Gamer where I'll go into more detail into why I love this game. For those of you who remember our Heavy Rain review, know how much that can be.

Friday, July 2, 2010

This question comes up a bit.

Do I hate the new iPhone?

The short answer is no, but there's more to it than that. Apple and I definitely have a love/hate relationship. I love my new MacBook Pro, it does things I couldn't even imagine how hard it would be to even begin to do on my old PC, however, at least my PC could do everything and my Macbook Pro doesn't. While it's a huge pain in the ass sometimes on the PC, at least it'll do what I want eventually, but if there's no way to do it on Mac, you have to figure out on hell of a workaround. I do enjoy the fact that on my Mac, I can put Windows 7 on here, if I feel the need, and believe me, I have felt the need, I just can't afford it right now.

Now, before my MacBook Pro, I had gotten acquainted with Apple through the iPod, and I had the iPod Mini, and that thing still works to this day. Sure, I stopped carrying it around after 15 months and then just lived off my laptop for media, but it was a decent experience.

Then the iPhone came out, and I was 100% Super...not impressed. Don't get me wrong, I thought it was cool and all, but I knew better than to buy first gen stuff, unless it's Nintendo. Although the promise of carrying around my media in my pocket in one device instead of separate devices was something that always appealed to me, but in most other phones it was thrown in at the last minute. Apple made a very clean interface that is still in my mind, completely unmatched by any competitor (but they're getting close now). However, I knew that it was too expensive, it was missing features other phones had for years, and it was small in non-expandeable storage. So I waited, and ignored the phone. Then the iPhone 3G and it addressed most of the issues I had with the phone, but I had no intention of getting one.

Then I got one. To be fair, it was a Christmas present so I didn't buy it. I explored the features of the phone and I was throughly impressed, and the App Store really helped shape the experience that is now iconic in people's mind. I really love the phone. After all, I still have it. The 3GS came out and basically was just a faster version of the phone I had, but I wasn't going to upgrade...you know, contracts and stuff, so I decided to upgrade what I thought would be the 4G.

Oh boy...where to begin. Let me start off by saying the phone is by no means bad, it's just incredibly, infuriatingly, disappointing. There are things that Apple has, for lack of better words, truly fucked up on. First and foremost, the antenna that runs around the phone that stops working as soon as you touch the phone, is almost unacceptable. Industrial design-wise, this is a huge snafu. The consumer should be able to use, hell, hold the product without any degradation to the experience the product provides.

Then, there's no 4G connectivity. I know what some of you are saying right now, "Jose, AT&T currently has no 4G network!"
Thanks, I'm totally aware of that. They will have one by next year, and I would like my phone to be future proof. They did it with the 3GS, after all, AT&T's HSPA+ network wasn't up by the time that phone came out, but that phone fully supported it, so why not this one?

However, my biggest gripe may be the lack of a 64 GB option. I have a lot of media on my Macbook Pro, so much media, that in only 7 months, I've used up 420 GB's of my 500 GB hard drive. Come on, would a 64 GB version be so hard to do? The problem I've always had, is that I love variety in my music, and with somewhat restrictive space (my current 8 GB iPhone) it's hard to get that. Also, I'm a bit of an audiophile and I get everything I can in the best possible quality available to me, which means I usually encode directly from a CD in a lossless compression format. The sad part is, even CD's are compressed, but much less than your typical MP3 download. I find most MP3's unlistenable. I don't get how people can even bother with such bad quality or demand better quality music, but that's another blog entirely. The point is, the higher the quality the song is, the more space it takes up, and the less songs I can put. I personally think that 64 GB's is perfect having enough media on the go, along with keeping the quality intact, and Apple failed to give it to me.

These may sound like small complaints, but in the future, I know these will add up. There are some other things, I didn't mention, and once again, I actually do think the phone is cool, but this is Apple here. The company that has changed the technology industry so many times, and while I don't think that Apple has to revolutionize the industry with every product, they at least could at least stop Jobs from hyping every product up to high heaven and ignoring any suggestion from the peanut gallery.

All in all, other than answering a couple of people's questions as to why I've been so vocal against the phone, I really don't have anything to gain by this. Apple's already sold like a million phones in less than a month. Hopefully, I've at least made you want more from Apple, because I guess Apple's doing something right if we're always asking for more from they're products, yet still have a smile on our faces when we open the box.

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Got my grade back from storytelling class...

for my strange attractor, and as I was looking over what I wrote I felt that it captured me very well...

Well, no shit, because I was the one who wrote, but fuck you, I wanted to put it in my blog anyways. So without further ado, my Strange Attractor from class, which is only here because I got an A on it. You're welcome.

"Overly arrogant, yet suffers from inferiority complex. Bold yet knowing when to hold back. Willing to speak in the third person to spice up his strange attractor and more than willing to break the fourth wall to point it out. He is not afraid to break the rules to screw with your (yes, YOUR) perception of reality and what you (yes, YOU) expect out of a story. With a background in acting and willing to get his hands dirty behind the scenes on the technical side of things, he is willing to go further to get the shots and make sure the story is entertaining but not insulting to one’s intelligence." - Jose Argumedo (Isn't he wonderful? He is...right?)

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

You know, the key to having a good blog is sticking with a topic.

I haven't been exactly clear about what I'm writing about so I thought I pick a subject and stick with it from here on out.

So I'm going to be perfectly clear about what this blog is about. No vagaries of perception, no SAT words, no overly long worded statements that really don't say anything, but seem to have artistic merit simply because you didn't understand it, and no sentences with comma's that overstay their welcome like my mother-in-law...well, actually I don't have a mother-in-law but shut up, I'm trying to make a point with this sentence! Oh shit, I just ended that last sentence without making a point, whoops.

Anyways, this blog will be about&mdash Holy Shit! Look behind you!

Sorry, couldn't resist...did you actually look behind you? I'm not continuing this until you do, because now you will have killed my joke. Go on I'll wait. This text isn't going anywhere. No, seriously, look behind you. There probably isn't anything there but look anyways because it's all building up towards a joke and you're going to ruin it. Who knows, there might actually be someone or something behind you, and this blog could have saved your life, but no, you decided to keep reading like one of the humorless adults we're destined to become because we don't understand the humor of the youth and become that guy. You know which guy. The guy who gets a prank played on him, but doesn't laugh about it ever, even when you retell this story to your friends. That's the guy who will end up shooing children off his lawn when they're actually at the playground across town, but he's become to senile and hateful that no one will ever love you, and you'll be forgotten within a decade.

You don't want to be that, right?

Good, so turn around, and then continue reading.

Actually, I didn't have a joke, I just wanted to see if you'd do it, but of course I'd never know since I can't see you, you dolt. If you did do it, good on you for playing along. If you didn't, thank God, you aren't stupid.

What was this post about again? I totally forgot...I could easily go back and read what I wrote but what's the point, I'm too lazy to change any of it now. Well, I hope I got my point across...whatever that may be.

Even the blog's title has a character limit.

One of the things I personally don't like about social networks is the limit on characters. Sure it's great for saying where you are, or quoting something out of context, but unfortunately there are many thoughts that go off into the distance to never be seen again because I simply didn't have enough letters to work with.

Now, I understand why they do this.

1) They do it to save bandwidth.
2) They do it so assholes like me don't write 13 pages worth of stuff and waste everyone's time.

It's true though, most people post self-important updates on Facebook, which if we really think about, don't do anything to add to society or even our own lives, and I guess the same could be said about blogs. However, at least here there's only one reason why people are even here, and that's to read someone's thoughts on something. Maybe they put a spin on it and show them a aspect of an event that they never thought of before.

The other thing that really pisses me off, is those bloody games on Facebook. If you play those, great, I honestly hope you're having fun with them, but it's really annoying when I'm trying to update my status and then you try to sell me sesame seeds in a game that I will probably never play.

Also, I'm sick and tired of people liking, what seems like, everything. It's like someone has a slightly clever remark and people like it instantly and feel the need to post it up and show everyone that they like it, only to forget that they even liked it within a day. What arbitrary silliness! If you truly like something, great, but to just like everything, well, that just makes you seem undeceive and almost unwilling to commit, so you try a lot of samples and see if anyone of them sticks, and find the other page that you liked sleeping with another person who liked them, and forgets about you already....sorry, I forgot where I was going with that.

My point is, I think I'm annoyed by social networks, but they have now become necessary to communicate with people that I simply can't leave something like Facebook. Joining Twitter almost seems less evil now, but they put a cap on thoughts over 140 characters so that was out. Besides, most people don't care what a person on Twitter thinks, or have nothing relevant to say, which I guess can go for blogs too, but at least people put somewhat more thought into a blog.

Boy, this introduction post went long, and I don't even think I specified what this blog is even going to be about. I guess, I'm just going to throw random thoughts here, and maybe someday after film school, I can always fallback on this and hopefully get paid. Oh and please click on the Ads, provided by Google AdSense because I am a total whore, and you know it's easier to leave the blog by clicking the Ad that going back up to the address bar. I mean, look how far it is.